JHVH (Jahve,Jehova) - jediný živý Bůh

Svobodu nám může přinést pouze největší zabiják nácků, súdruh veliký Stálin!

VY kolaborantský děvky! Kdo z vás za válku vyhazoval německý vlaky do luftu? Nikdo, buď jste byli na houbách a vaši prarodiče drželi hubu a krok a dělali tanky ze Škodovky rovnou pro Reich, zatímco já bojoval za vaší svobodu v lesích východní Evropy, žral jsem jen dubovou kůru a střílel nácky!

Co se nehodí to se vyškrtne , zamaže ... Co se hodí to se přidá ... Takto , se píší vaše "svaté" knihy ...

Je to Projev starosty Řeporyjí Pavla Novotného před druhou volbou 1. místopředsedy ODS. :-)

Lidi pod videem tipují buď kokain, nebo pervitin nebo marihuanu. Já jsem drogy nikdy nezkoušel, takže to nepoznám, jen vidím, že něco užil....

Jirko, dokážeš z jeho projevu poznat, co užívá za drogu? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f0G4NGmB_k

Kurt Gödel's Platonism[6] postulates a special kind of mathematical intuition that lets us perceive mathematical objects directly. (This view bears resemblances to many things Husserl said about mathematics, and supports Kant's idea that mathematics is synthetic a priori.) Davis and Hersh have suggested in their 1999 book The Mathematical Experience that most mathematicians act as though they are Platonists, even though, if pressed to defend the position carefully, they may retreat to formalism.

Full-blooded Platonism is a modern variation of Platonism, which is in reaction to the fact that different sets of mathematical entities can be proven to exist depending on the axioms and inference rules employed (for instance, the law of the excluded middle, and the axiom of choice). It holds that all mathematical entities exist, however they may be provable, even if they cannot all be derived from a single consistent set of axioms.[7]

Set-theoretic realism (also set-theoretic Platonism)[8] a position defended by Penelope Maddy, is the view that set theory is about a single universe of sets.[9] This position (which is also known as naturalized Platonism because it is a naturalized version of mathematical Platonism) has been criticized by Mark Balaguer on the basis of Paul Benacerraf's epistemological problem.[10] A similar view, termed Platonized naturalism, was later defended by the Stanford–Edmonton School: according to this view, a more traditional kind of Platonism is consistent with naturalism; the more traditional kind of Platonism they defend is distinguished by general principles that assert the existence of abstract objects.[11]

Mathematical Platonism is the form of realism that suggests that mathematical entities are abstract, have no spatiotemporal or causal properties, and are eternal and unchanging. This is often claimed to be the view most people have of numbers. The term Platonism is used because such a view is seen to parallel Plato's Theory of Forms and a "World of Ideas" (Greek: eidos (εἶδος)) described in Plato's allegory of the cave: the everyday world can only imperfectly approximate an unchanging, ultimate reality. Both Plato's cave and Platonism have meaningful, not just superficial connections, because Plato's ideas were preceded and probably influenced by the hugely popular Pythagoreans of ancient Greece, who believed that the world was, quite literally, generated by numbers.

A major question considered in mathematical Platonism is: Precisely where and how do the mathematical entities exist, and how do we know about them? Is there a world, completely separate from our physical one, that is occupied by the mathematical entities? How can we gain access to this separate world and discover truths about the entities? One proposed answer is the Ultimate Ensemble, a theory that postulates that all structures that exist mathematically also exist physically in their own universe.

Mathematical Platonism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_mathematics

Předpokládáš Rakato matematiku? Čísla jsou nehmotná a je o nich celá věda, tzv. matematika.